Elevated Insulin Sensitivity in Low‐protein Offspring Rats Is Prevented by a High‐fat Diet and Is Associated With Visceral Fat

AK Gosby, CA Maloney, ID Caterson - Obesity, 2010 - Wiley Online Library
AK Gosby, CA Maloney, ID Caterson
Obesity, 2010Wiley Online Library
This study tests the hypothesis that a high‐fat postnatal diet increases fat mass and reduces
improved insulin sensitivity (IS) found in the low‐protein model of maternal undernutrition.
Offspring from Wistar dams fed either a 20%(control (CON)) or 8%(low protein (LP)) protein
diet during gestation and lactation were randomly assigned to a control (con) or cafeteria
(caf) diet at weaning (21 days) until 3 months of age at which point IS was measured
(hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp). Fat mass, growth, energy intake (EI) and expenditure …
This study tests the hypothesis that a high‐fat postnatal diet increases fat mass and reduces improved insulin sensitivity (IS) found in the low‐protein model of maternal undernutrition. Offspring from Wistar dams fed either a 20% (control (CON)) or 8% (low protein (LP)) protein diet during gestation and lactation were randomly assigned to a control (con) or cafeteria (caf) diet at weaning (21 days) until 3 months of age at which point IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp). Fat mass, growth, energy intake (EI) and expenditure (EE), fuel utilization, insulin secretion, and leptin and adiponectin levels were measured to identify a possible role in any changes in IS. IS was increased in LP‐con in comparison to CON‐con animals. Cafeteria feeding prevented this increase in LP animals but had no effect in CON animals (insulin‐stimulated glucose infusion rates (GIRs; mg/min/kg); CON‐con: 13.9 ± 1.0, CON caf: 12.1 ± 2.1, LP‐con: 25.4 ± 2.0, LP‐caf: 13.7 ± 3.7, P < 0.05). CON‐caf animals had similar percent epididymal white adipose tissue (%EWAT; CON‐con: 1.71 ± 0.09 vs. CON‐caf: 1.66 ± 0.08) and adiponectin (µg/ml: CON‐con: 4.61 ± 0.34 vs. CON‐caf: 3.67 ± 0.18) except hyperinsulinemia and relative hyperleptinemia in comparison to CON‐con. Differently, LP‐caf animals had increased %EWAT (LP‐con: 1.11 ± 0.06 vs. LP‐caf: 1.44 ± 0.08, P < 0.05) and adiponectin (µg/ml: LP‐con: 5.38 ± 0.39 vs. LP‐caf: 3.75 ± 0.35, P < 0.05) but did not show cafeteria‐induced hyperinsulinemia or relative hyperleptinemia. An increased propensity to store visceral fat in LP animals may prevent the elevated IS in LP offspring.
Wiley Online Library