Medical faculty as humanistic physicians and teachers: the perceptions of students at innovative and traditional medical schools

B Maheux, C Beaudoin, L Berkson, L Côté… - Medical …, 2000 - Wiley Online Library
B Maheux, C Beaudoin, L Berkson, L Côté, J Des Marchais, P Jean
Medical Education, 2000Wiley Online Library
Background and objectives The training of caring physicians represents an important goal of
medical education. Little is known however, on whether medical faculty constitute good role
models for teaching humanistic skills to medical students. In this study, we examined to what
extent medical students at innovative and traditional schools perceived their teachers as
humanistic physicians and teachers. We also explored whether pre‐clinical and clinical
students shared the same perceptions. Methods A mail survey was conducted in Canada of …
Background and objectives
The training of caring physicians represents an important goal of medical education. Little is known however, on whether medical faculty constitute good role models for teaching humanistic skills to medical students. In this study, we examined to what extent medical students at innovative and traditional schools perceived their teachers as humanistic physicians and teachers. We also explored whether pre‐clinical and clinical students shared the same perceptions.
Methods
A mail survey was conducted in Canada of all second‐year students and senior clerks at one innovative medical school (problem‐based learning (PBL), patient‐centred, community‐oriented) and three traditional medical schools. Students were asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed that the majority of their teachers behaved as humanistic physicians and teachers; 10 statements were used. Overall, 65% of the 1039 students returned the questionnaire.
Results
Over 25% of second‐year students and 40% of senior clerks did not agree that their teachers behaved as humanistic caregivers with patients or were good role models in teaching the doctor–patient relationship. More than half of second‐year students and senior clerks did not agree that their teachers valued human contact with them or were supportive of students who had difficulties. There were few differences in the way medical students at innovative and traditional schools perceived their teachers’ humanistic qualities. At the pre‐clinical level however, there were more students from the innovative school than from the traditional schools (around 60% vs. 40%, P < 0·005) who agreed that their teachers valued human contact with them and were supportive of students.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that the PBL curriculum fosters better teacher–student relationships during the pre‐clinical years. They also suggest that an unacceptably large number of medical students are taught by physicians who seem to lack compassion and caring in their interactions with patients. This study questions the adequacy of medical faculty as role models for the acquisition of caring competence by medical students.
Wiley Online Library