Insulin sensitivity index, acute insulin response, and glucose effectiveness in a population-based sample of 380 young healthy Caucasians. Analysis of the impact of …

JO Clausen, K Borch-Johnsen, H Ibsen… - The Journal of …, 1996 - Am Soc Clin Investig
JO Clausen, K Borch-Johnsen, H Ibsen, RN Bergman, P Hougaard, K Winther, O Pedersen
The Journal of clinical investigation, 1996Am Soc Clin Investig
BACKGROUND: Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion are traits that are both genetically
and environmentally determined. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the distribution
of the insulin sensitivity index (Si), the acute insulin response, and glucose effectiveness
(Sg) in young healthy Caucasians and to estimate the relative impact of anthropometric and
environmental determinants on these variables. METHODS: The material included 380
unrelated Caucasian subjects (18-32 yr) with measurement of Si, Sg and insulin secretion …
BACKGROUND
Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion are traits that are both genetically and environmentally determined.
AIM
The aim of this study was to describe the distribution of the insulin sensitivity index (Si), the acute insulin response, and glucose effectiveness (Sg) in young healthy Caucasians and to estimate the relative impact of anthropometric and environmental determinants on these variables.
METHODS
The material included 380 unrelated Caucasian subjects (18-32 yr) with measurement of Si, Sg and insulin secretion during a combined intravenous glucose (0.3 grams/kg body weight) and tolbutamide (3 mg/kg body weight) tolerance test.
RESULTS
The distributions of Si and acute insulin response were skewed to the right, whereas the distribution of Sg was Gaussian distributed. Sg was 15% higher in women compared with men (P < 0.001). Waist circumference, body mass index, maximal aerobic capacity, and women's use of oral contraceptives were the most important determinants of Si. Approximately one-third of the variation of Si could be explained by these factors. Compared with individuals in the upper four-fifths of the distribution of Si, subjects with Si in the lowest fifth had higher waist circumference, higher blood pressure, lower VO2max, and lower glucose tolerance and fasting dyslipidemia and dysfibrinolysis. Only 10% of the variation in acute insulin response could be explained by measured determinants.
CONCLUSION
Estimates of body fat, maximal aerobic capacity, and women's use of oral contraceptives explain about one-third of the variation in Si in a population-based sample of young healthy Caucasians.
The Journal of Clinical Investigation